We have dealt at length in this publication with the perversion of Judaism by anti-Semites. As any honest person who has studied the Jewish Question impartially will realise, throughout history, the Jewish people have been their own worst enemy; (60) this applies particularly to the leaders of Organised Jewry and the Zionist movement in general. Calumnies on the Talmud by anti-Semites have never cut any ice with the overwhelming majority of the population of any country in which Jews live, but perversions of the Jewish religion by those who profess to embrace it are a different matter entirely.
In 1991, Andrew Hurley published a book called Israel and the New World Order, (61) which exposed as never before the mendacity of political Zionism. Chapter XII of this book, Saving Israel from Suicide, contains an exposé of a number of serious perversions of the Jewish religion by religious fanatics, in particular the equating of the Arabs – or even the rest of mankind – with Amalek, whom the Jews are commanded to annihilate totally. Certain passages in the Jewish Scriptures have been twisted to justify murder and even genocide. Author Hurley appears to accept the view that these perversions have been brought about by religious Jews; they have not. The perversion of the Scriptures is clearly another device of political Zionism – which is above all a secular movement – in order to justify the expansionist aims of its fascistic and bloody-handed leaders.
Before any anti-Semite reads the mythical “Jewish evil” into such deeds, he should bear two facts in mind: 1) the Devil himself can quote Scripture when it suits him; 2) such perversions of Scripture are by no means exclusive to the Jewish religion: bigotry has been justified by both Christian and Islamic fundamentalists, as we have clearly seen both in the West with the “Christian” racist movement (62) Aryan nations etc and with the rise of Islamic fundamentalism in the East, of which the Salman Rushdie affair is perhaps the most notorious example. (63)
To Summary And Conclusion
To Notes And References
Back To Postscript To The Second Edition
Back To Further Points Of Controversy
Back To Case For The Defence (3)
Back To Case For The Defence (2)
Back To Case For The Defence (1)
Back To A Note On Slight Inconsistencies
Back To Case For The Prosecution
Back To A Note On Sources
Back To To The Reader
Back To Preface
Back To Foreword
Back To Frontispiece
Back To Author Credits
Back To Front Cover
Back To Baron Pamphlets Index
Back To Site Index